(no subject)
Sep. 21st, 2005 10:00 pmNow wait just a second. I am not a new-age whack-job (at least I think I'm not!), but I have never heard a more suspicious description pointing to Bush as an "Antichrist":
a. Antichrist's rise to power in Middle East ( Read more... )
Elsewhere it talks about the President and WWIII and him having a "strong Cancer influence" and well, Bush is a Cancer (ha ha) with pretty much every other planet squeezed onto the same side of his chart, producing lots of sextiles and squares. *boggle*
I suppose this is what I get for reading talk.religion.newage for entertainment before going to bed (ugh, getting up at 7). Less apple cider next time. (You can see the whole series on Google if you want; I note with amusement that the same stuff was posted over six years ago. Ain't that always the way with these kinds of things?)
a. Antichrist's rise to power in Middle East ( Read more... )
Elsewhere it talks about the President and WWIII and him having a "strong Cancer influence" and well, Bush is a Cancer (ha ha) with pretty much every other planet squeezed onto the same side of his chart, producing lots of sextiles and squares. *boggle*
I suppose this is what I get for reading talk.religion.newage for entertainment before going to bed (ugh, getting up at 7). Less apple cider next time. (You can see the whole series on Google if you want; I note with amusement that the same stuff was posted over six years ago. Ain't that always the way with these kinds of things?)