![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 01:10 am
I'm amused at the implication that Folsom has no taste. Maybe that's because they don't have the touch. It apparently doesn't totally stink, though.
Jun. 21st, 2007
I'm amused at the implication that Folsom has no taste. Maybe that's because they don't have the touch. It apparently doesn't totally stink, though.
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 01:10 amI'm amused at the implication that Folsom has no taste. Maybe that's because they don't have the touch. It apparently doesn't totally stink, though.
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 02:02 pm"To be clear: listing an illegal activity in your interests list isn't a violation of the Terms of Service in isolation, and we won't equate individual interests with activities you support or advocate."
Well, that's something, anyway. The whole thing about "taken as a whole, in context" is still pretty vague -- by whose standards? Who is responsible for judging? But at least the idea of "interest == support OMG wrong" has been addressed.
"We're going to be extra careful in making sure we avoid these sorts of miscommunications internally" -- um, in what way? "Be extra careful" is also vague, even a touch unprofessional.
Well, that's something, anyway. The whole thing about "taken as a whole, in context" is still pretty vague -- by whose standards? Who is responsible for judging? But at least the idea of "interest == support OMG wrong" has been addressed.
"We're going to be extra careful in making sure we avoid these sorts of miscommunications internally" -- um, in what way? "Be extra careful" is also vague, even a touch unprofessional.
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 02:02 pm"To be clear: listing an illegal activity in your interests list isn't a violation of the Terms of Service in isolation, and we won't equate individual interests with activities you support or advocate."
Well, that's something, anyway. The whole thing about "taken as a whole, in context" is still pretty vague -- by whose standards? Who is responsible for judging? But at least the idea of "interest == support OMG wrong" has been addressed.
"We're going to be extra careful in making sure we avoid these sorts of miscommunications internally" -- um, in what way? "Be extra careful" is also vague, even a touch unprofessional.
Well, that's something, anyway. The whole thing about "taken as a whole, in context" is still pretty vague -- by whose standards? Who is responsible for judging? But at least the idea of "interest == support OMG wrong" has been addressed.
"We're going to be extra careful in making sure we avoid these sorts of miscommunications internally" -- um, in what way? "Be extra careful" is also vague, even a touch unprofessional.
(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 02:50 pm*giggles* Buried in the comments on http://community.livejournal.com/lj_biz/240941.html :
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
mosspiglet: there are so many reports of people reporting gross, obscene offensive content to the abuse team, and getting the reply "we cant do anything because its not illegal" ....
imaria: What you find offensive, others may not. [...] Frankly, I'd rather that LJ Abuse played with a light touch.
mosspiglet: im talking, nasty nasty filth not suited for anyone.
filkerdave: But enough about the Republican party platform.
mosspiglet: there are so many reports of people reporting gross, obscene offensive content to the abuse team, and getting the reply "we cant do anything because its not illegal" .... imaria: What you find offensive, others may not. [...] Frankly, I'd rather that LJ Abuse played with a light touch.mosspiglet: im talking, nasty nasty filth not suited for anyone. filkerdave: But enough about the Republican party platform.(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2007 02:50 pm*giggles* Buried in the comments on http://community.livejournal.com/lj_biz/240941.html :
mosspiglet: there are so many reports of people reporting gross, obscene offensive content to the abuse team, and getting the reply "we cant do anything because its not illegal" ....
imaria: What you find offensive, others may not. [...] Frankly, I'd rather that LJ Abuse played with a light touch.
mosspiglet: im talking, nasty nasty filth not suited for anyone.
filkerdave: But enough about the Republican party platform.
mosspiglet: there are so many reports of people reporting gross, obscene offensive content to the abuse team, and getting the reply "we cant do anything because its not illegal" .... imaria: What you find offensive, others may not. [...] Frankly, I'd rather that LJ Abuse played with a light touch.mosspiglet: im talking, nasty nasty filth not suited for anyone. filkerdave: But enough about the Republican party platform.