This whole "new sign" thing (besides being silly) isn't new. Apparently it's Babylonian but they decided to discard it. I remember reading a book once when the local public library still had the adult non-fiction over where the sci-fi/fantasy fiction is now which talked about how Ophiuchus was "really" in the zodiac and laid out dates for the "thirteen" signs like they had invented it. This body memory of where I picked the book off the shelf dates it minimum 15 years ago, probably more, and the book itself was hardly crisp and new at the time. So.
Someone on
nonfluffypagans commented that it was old news but what was new was that now people could tweet it and Facebook it and whatever-the-hell-it so the idea would spread faster than any rationality.
Someone on
no subject
Date: Jan. 14th, 2011 10:29 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Jan. 15th, 2011 12:43 am (UTC)From:The uproar this has caused has made me LOL lots this week.
no subject
Date: Jan. 15th, 2011 03:57 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Jan. 15th, 2011 02:48 pm (UTC)From:With the recent bringing-up-again of it, now everybody who heard about it in class in the same way that I did can hear the rest of the argument. It's sort of interesting timing, too, since I just finally got interested in astrology this week.