so what's wrong with changing a name to reflect one's current state? is there something in the great book of all things bad against that? sure, i guess, confusing for people on mailing lists.. but if I named myself "Elisann Tulgey" at the moment, after the Tulgey Wood in "Jabberwocky" (which is rather how I feel at the moment - dark, confused, but with wonder and fantastical things hiding in the shadows), would it be somehow wrong not to keep that when it passed? to keep changing my name or part of my name as circumstances dictated?
no subject
Date: Dec. 19th, 2002 10:42 pm (UTC)From:Every couple of years? Doable. Maybe pushing it, in some folks' opinions, but doable.
Every decade? Perfectly respectable, in my book.
Less often than that? Perhaps a bit more introspection is called for. Or a bit less stagnation.
no subject
Date: Dec. 19th, 2002 10:46 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 19th, 2002 11:00 pm (UTC)From:Just out of curiosity, and for the data point since I respect your opinions, do you think that would be too often for me? Or do you not know enough about me to make that judgement? Or the questio might be, to keep within the parameters of your comment, do you think it's lack of sufficient instropection, or too much stagnation that would lead to such for me?
If you have no clue, that's a fine answer - just if you have any thoughts on the matter I'd like to hear them. They'd be interesting if nothing else.
no subject
Date: Dec. 19th, 2002 11:04 pm (UTC)From:Seriously though. Having a small repertoire and changing every day - or more often, depending on how I was feelign with the post - is too much. Too minute, too - giving too much detail, too much separation to something that is really a single phenomenon of me, in all my variations. Part of this is letting go of the need to label every little thing (down, Virgo, down!) and letting a variety of characteristics and stuff be subsumed under one name or label. And yet, I feel that I am a dynamic being and there's no way I can stick to a single name (short of my "true name", which like most people's I suspect isn't even a "word" as we know it) for any lengthy period of time. Too much change and discovery going on for that. In a way, a name is as much a statement to myself as it is a term of address for other people.
no subject
Date: Dec. 19th, 2002 11:16 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 02:25 am (UTC)From:Having experienced this... if you really want people to call you by your new name, you have to get very insistant, especially with people like relatives and those who think what you're doing is silly or otherwise don't get it. You learn to automaticly correct people, because they just won't do it on their own, many of them.
Not only that, but some people take a long time to get adjusted. Some people will get it in a couple of days, while it may take others a couple of years. If you continue to change your name, many of these people will not know what to call you, so they'll continue to call you Lisa since that's your "real name" in their eyes anyways.
If you're considering going the legal route, I can assure you that it's a giant pain in the ass you don't want to do more than once. I went through the courts and it cost me about $300 and three months for my name change. If you go by the usage method, it takes 7 years to become permanant. Either way, trying to correct all the businesses and creditors who have the wrong name for you sucks, and you don't want to do this more than once. (The older you get, the more people have official records for you, and the more people you'll have to change this with. Even now 6 and a half years after my legal name change, there are still a couple of institutions (banks, etc.) that don't have the correct name for me.)
So, I don't think there's anything wrong with it, no. But, I don't think you'd get taken seriously by many people if you changed your name more often than every 5 years at the bare minimum, and I think it would be a giant pain in the ass for you to deal with no matter how seriously you were taken.
no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 02:31 am (UTC)From:I suggest you decide on a fairly permanant name and stick with it for legal and family purposes, and maybe have an ever-changing nickname you ask your friends to call you. This should minimize the irritation aspect, while still allowing you the freedom of frequent self-definition.
Personal Choices
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 09:03 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 09:30 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 11:41 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 01:12 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 05:23 pm (UTC)From:And everyone's gotten used to that. If I suddenly decide to -- heck, let's say I just decide to use my middle name, David. People are not in the habit of calling me "Dave" or "David". They don't think of me as David. It would take at least three or four months for them to get used to that (probably more like six), and the only way it would happen is if I trained them to it by never responding to Kai. (Which would require training myself, too -- looking around at the sound of one's name is pretty reflexive.)
Yes, I know this is really a practicality issue, not a spiritual one. But if there are big practicality problems with a thing like this, it will get in the way of the spiritual effect. If you're constantly having to battle against everyone's ingrained habits (including your own!), that energy is taken away from actually walking the path. Make sense?
no subject
Date: Dec. 20th, 2002 05:38 pm (UTC)From: