arethinn: glowing green spiral (Default)
I'm confused. This "track food and nutrition" site I'm using has six entries for "sushi" in its database of known foods:

Sushi, NFS (I don't know what "NFS" stands for; it appears on a number of foods, and I think it must mean "no ____ stated", but I'm not sure quite what)
Sushi, no vegetables, no fish
Sushi, with vegetables, no fish
Sushi, with vegetables and fish
Sushi, with vegetables, rolled in seaweed
Sushi, with egg, no vegetables, no fish, rolled in seaweed

Sooo... when you take away egg, vegetables and fish, and it's not specified to have been wrapped in seaweed, aren't you down to just rice? What the heck is the point of that?

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 04:19 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] graphxgrrl.livejournal.com
There is tamago - which is egg. Depending on how they define roe, it's not technically fish. There's also squid, clams, eel, which are technically not fish. You can also make rolls with chicken and various other things. I've seen some with duck as well.

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 04:44 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] starlightforest.livejournal.com
You might want to reread my updated version of the post; egg is mentioned in one of them. I think "fish" is probably standing in for any kind of seafood here, as it's based off the USDA database (I can tell by the form of the food names). *shrug* I dunno!

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 04:51 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] soundwave106.livejournal.com
That sounds like Fitday.com's food nutrition chart, which is admittedly, um, very weird in some of its descriptions. I think it's hard to trust anything but the basics on that place, but at least the basics are okay I guess.

I noticed one piece of no vegetables no fish sushi is only 46 calories. That's a lot of calories for essentially nothing. :P

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 05:02 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] starlightforest.livejournal.com
I can tell by the way the names are that it is based off the USDA's database (http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
(http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/)), but yeah, I agree it's kind of weird in some places.

I'm guessing that must be the calories in just the rice? I really don't know.

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 05:07 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] twopiearr.livejournal.com
there are at least two restaurants around here that have beef and/or pork "sushi" on the menu...maybe the people who designed the list are just super ware of cooking fusion trends?

Date: Apr. 19th, 2004 06:01 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] nsingman.livejournal.com
If memory serves, the term "sushi" refers to that vinegared rice itself. It was used as a way to preserve fish, and I think the rice was originally discarded when the fish was eaten. As a low carb dieter, I eat sashimi, which is just the raw fish. And oh, how I love it! :-)

Profile

arethinn: glowing green spiral (Default)
Arethinn

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 2122232425 26
2728293031  

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 05:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios