(no subject)

[arethinn]

So now that the phrase has been determined to probably be "Where's the percentage in...", the actual post that I wanted to use it in:

Where's the percentage in being a really rude, abrasive som'bitch? I know I can get pretty tart myself when I am annoyed with someone for not knowing something (regardless of whether it was reasonable to expect them to know it), which is also bad. But when I have negative opinions about something, I try not to frame them in extremely strong language, nor to be completely dismissive of $WHATEVER. In general I hope I successfully avoid coming across as an all-purpose obnoxious jerk, although I probably do so on accident sometimes.

But why would someone want to do so on purpose, or if not precisely "on purpose", to happily cite "that's just the way I am" as a supposed excuse for generally mean behavior? (For the otherkin out there, "I can't help doing $CRAPPY_ACTION because I am a $SPECIES" is a variant.) I know have no right to dictate others' personal communication styles in situations I don't control, but I really don't get why this makes it "okay" for them to be harsh all the time. It just seems like an incredible waste of energy to be constantly aggressive and I have very little will or desire to engage with it. (Usually I drop out of such arguments after a few exchanges, which sometimes provides fodder for sarcastic "awww, too-sensitive couldn't take the heat! you've just realized that you're WRONG, you just don't want to admit it" sorts of comments, but there's nothing I can do about that; why keep banging my head against a wall, really.)

To me it generally reads as a lack of any basic respect for the thing or person under discussion and for others in the conversation. Why should being addressed in a noncombative manner be a privilege that has to be earned by being "good enough" or "impressive enough"?

In short, I know I am basically a weak, bland personality and this world would be pretty dull if everyone were in fact as, ah, let's say "temperate" as I am, but goddamnit, why do some people have to be so fucking nasty?

Comments

[desree42.livejournal.com]

Oh and I wouldn't call your personality bland or weak at all. Just different. Different personalities are suited to different things, different jobs, positions, life calling and all of that sort of thjing. These differences, and I feel very cheesy for saying so, are part of what makes it worthwhile to talk to someone in a contentious discussion and, at times, make it worthwhile to get out of bed in the morning.

[starlightforest.livejournal.com]

Hrm, well... see comment above about seeing only a part of someone on the internet. I must appear to be more interesting on livejournal than I am in real life ;) Really... I get really worked up about very few things, and my idea situation would be for everyone to always be friends (to quote a Fraggle Rock episode, about Wembley), or at least to never speak any angry words to one another. So most of the time I am meek and don't say things because I don't want to start an argument, or just stop rather than standing up for myself when it seems I am getting into one, because i would rather avoid the conflict than be "right".